§35 · Lane 7 — Australian Regulatory Primary Instruments
Australia's AI Ethics Framework / Principles the historical baseline beneath the 2024 Standard
Australian Government (2019) · AU AI Ethics
Bibliographic data
- Title
- Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework / AI Ethics Principles (2019)
- Authors / Issuing body
- Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS, since renamed Department of Industry, Science and Resources — DISR)
- Venue / Publisher
- Commonwealth of Australia
- Year
- 2019
- Designation
- Guidance
- Licence
- Refer to publisher for full licence terms.
How to cite
Australian Government (2019). Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework / AI Ethics Principles (2019). Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles.
Australia's eight-principle AI Ethics Framework — human, social and environmental wellbeing; human-centred values; fairness; privacy protection and security; reliability and safety; transparency and explainability; contestability; accountability. The AU baseline against which CSIRO Data61 / Sanderson 2023 empirically tested principle-application by Australian organisations.
Why it matters for NETEVO
Australia's eight AI Ethics Principles are the foundational AU baseline against which every downstream Australian AI governance instrument is built. The principles — human, social and environmental wellbeing; human-centred values; fairness; privacy protection and security; reliability and safety; transparency and explainability; contestability; accountability — were released by the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science on 7 November 2019 and have anchored the Australian ethics vocabulary ever since.
Foundational normative spine. The eight principles map onto the ten guardrails of the DISR Voluntary AI Safety Standard and onto the assessment questions of the NSW AI Assurance Framework almost cleanly. The downstream operationalisation is built on the 2019 principles: the Australian governance lineage runs from this framework, not from OECD or IEEE framings.
The AU answer to the AI-ethics framing. Where global discussions reach for the OECD AI Principles or IEEE Ethically Aligned Design, AU-domiciled organisations with ESG reporting obligations or board-level AI ethics commitments operate from these eight principles directly. They are the established baseline of Australian AI governance, and the natural reference point against which an organisation's claimed AI-ethics commitments are tested.
Superseded operationally, not historically. On 21 October 2025 DISR published the Guidance for AI Adoption with six essential practices, updated and republished 5 May 2026 on the new National AI Centre domain. The DISR Ethics Principles page now records that the Guidance for AI Adoption evolves both the Voluntary AI Safety Standard guardrails and these eight principles. The 2019 framework remains the foundational baseline; the 2026 Guidance for AI Adoption is the current operational form. The two work together: the baseline establishes the lineage, and the current guidance establishes what an Australian organisation is expected to do today.
No longer voluntary everywhere — mandatory for the NSW public sector. Nationally the eight principles remain a voluntary framework. In New South Wales they are not. The NSW AI Operational Policy, whose compliance is mandated by Circular DCS-2026-02 issued on 30 July 2026, makes it a mandatory requirement for NSW Government agencies to adhere to Australia's AI Ethics Principles when using, designing, developing, deploying and implementing AI systems. That policy replaces the former NSW AI Ethics Policy and substitutes these eight national principles for the NSW-specific set, and the NSW AI Assessment Framework requires agencies to record how a project aligns with them — so the obligation is evidenced rather than declared. Any description of these principles as uniformly voluntary is now imprecise: the accurate formulation is voluntary nationally, mandatory for NSW Government agencies. The distinction matters commercially to anyone supplying the NSW Government.
Where NETEVO applies this
- AI Governance in ANZ Whitepaper — foundational ethics-baseline citation
- About / Methodology page — AU ethics-baseline anchor
Who acts on this
Reading this usually means something has forced the question — a listing, an audit finding, a procurement questionnaire, a regulator's letter. The role pages below set out what NETEVO does about it, including where we would tell you not to engage.