§27 · Lane 7 — Australian Regulatory Primary Instruments

NSW AI Assurance / Assessment Framework the operational template for NSW Government suppliers

NSW Government (2022, renamed 2024) · NSW AIAF

Guidance Tier 1 Lane 7 Stable URL
Read on publisher · Stable URL

Bibliographic data

Title
NSW Government AI Assurance Framework (March 2022) / NSW AI Assessment Framework (1 July 2024 update)
Authors / Issuing body
NSW Department of Customer Service (Digital NSW)
Venue / Publisher
NSW Government
Year
2022
Designation
Guidance
Licence
Refer to publisher for full licence terms.

How to cite

NSW Government (2022, renamed 2024). NSW Government AI Assurance Framework (March 2022) / NSW AI Assessment Framework (1 July 2024 update). NSW Government. https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/policy/artificial-intelligence/ai-governance-assurance-and-frameworks/nsw-ai-assessment-framework.

The NSW state-government framework for assessing AI risk in agency projects. Originally issued March 2022 as the AI Assurance Framework; renamed and substantially updated 1 July 2024 as the AI Assessment Framework now distributed as an Excel workbook integrated with the NSW Digital Assurance Framework. The most operationally detailed AU state-government AI framework.

Why it matters for NETEVO

The NSW AI Assurance Framework — first issued in March 2022, renamed the AI Assessment Framework on 1 July 2024, and now distributed as an Excel workbook integrated into the NSW Digital Assurance Framework — is the most workflow-detailed Australian state-government AI framework in circulation. Read alongside ISO/IEC 42001 and ISO/IEC 42005, it demonstrates that a single well-constructed assessment template can serve several regulatory regimes at once.

Operational template, not aspirational guidance. The framework ships as a project-level question bank with risk-rating matrices and executive sign-off fields. For any organisation supplying AI into the NSW Government supply chain, the workbook is the concrete statement of what the assurance process expects to see — precisely the kind of operational template that the Law-to-Code Methodology translates into engineered controls.

Binding via Circular DCS-2026-02. The Use of Artificial Intelligence by NSW Government Agencies circular binds NSW Government agencies and most NSW Government suppliers through grant and contract conditions. The current circular is DCS-2026-02, issued 30 July 2026, which replaced the 2024 circular DCS-2024-04 — now archived. What changed is the instrument mandated alongside the framework: the archived circular mandated the NSW AI Ethics Policy, while DCS-2026-02 mandates the NSW AI Operational Policy. The framework update also broadens scope to address generative AI and aligns with the Commonwealth National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government and the EU AI Act, so a single set of assessment outputs can be carried across to federal and international comparator regimes.

Registration first, and a platform on the way. Under the NSW AI Operational Policy every AI use case must be registered in the AI Assessment Framework Platform, and the registration outcome determines whether a full assessment is required — the framework is no longer triggered by an agency's own judgement about materiality alone. The Platform is being deployed by the NSW Office for AI and is not yet fully adopted; during the transition agencies must continue to apply the existing Excel-based assessment process to all AI use cases. Assessments must also be revisited across the system lifecycle and whenever changes to risk, context or functionality could affect outcomes or oversight.

NSW AI Review Committee operational. NSW now runs a published external-expert AI Review Committee that takes referrals of high and critical risk assessment outputs via the NSW Office for AI. The committee issues advisory recommendations only; agencies retain decision-making authority. Two consequences follow: high and critical risk assessments are now prepared in the knowledge that they may face external expert scrutiny, and the committee's composition — drawn heavily from the UTS Human Technology Institute, the Gradient Institute, and the federal AI Expert Group — indicates where Australian AI assurance practice is consolidating.

Where NETEVO applies this

Who acts on this

Reading this usually means something has forced the question — a listing, an audit finding, a procurement questionnaire, a regulator's letter. The role pages below set out what NETEVO does about it, including where we would tell you not to engage.