§3 · Lane 1 — Rules-as-Code / Law-as-Code

Transforming Legal Texts into Computational Logic the 2026 frontier, validated in a ministry deployment

Bertl, Price, Draheim (2026) · IJCCE 7

Academic Tier 1 Lane 1 DOI
Read on publisher · DOI

Bibliographic data

Title
Transforming legal texts into computational logic: Enhancing next generation public sector automation through explainable AI decision support (2026)
Authors / Issuing body
Markus Bertl (Unisys / WU Vienna), Simon Price (Bristol), Dirk Draheim (Tallinn University of Technology)
Venue / Publisher
International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering 7 (2026) 40-57
Year
2026
Designation
Academic
Licence
Refer to publisher for full licence terms.

How to cite

Bertl, Price, Draheim (2026). Transforming legal texts into computational logic: Enhancing next generation public sector automation through explainable AI decision support (2026). International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering 7 (2026) 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcce.2025.07.003.

Prolog + NLP + XAI pipeline for extracting executable rules from legal text, validated on the Austrian Study Funding Act at the Austrian Ministry of Finance; outlines a path to integrating LLMs into the rule-extraction pipeline while preserving traceability and explainability.

Why it matters for NETEVO

The 2026 frontier. Bertl, Price and Draheim present a peer-reviewed Prolog + NLP + XAI pipeline for extracting executable rules from legal text, validated on the Austrian Study Funding Act in a real deployment at the Austrian Ministry of Finance — demonstrated practice, not vendor speculation. The paper outlines a path to integrating LLMs into the rule-extraction pipeline while preserving traceability and explainability, and quotes the OECD's five benefits of coded rules — Consistency, Agility, Improved Policy Outcomes, Digital Optimisation, Scrutiny of Rules — a concise framework for assessing what an organisation gains when its rules are expressed as executable logic.

Where NETEVO applies this

Who acts on this

Reading this usually means something has forced the question — a listing, an audit finding, a procurement questionnaire, a regulator's letter. The role pages below set out what NETEVO does about it, including where we would tell you not to engage.